Pray to RNGesus that this time the "epic legend extreme gauntlets of bob" or whatever you want to call it will drop! or spend 100 hours fishing. Power creep and meaningless grind are the result. Theme parks like wow have a carrot on a stick that continuously gets dragged further and further away. And I like this blood raider event going on right now over 1000 kills on zkill have one of the blood raider event ships on the killmail. New pve content hits pretty often in new missions, Incursions, Drifters, Burners, and wormholes. Not to mention the content changes that happen as players enter/leave the game. Also content is constantly being refreshed as balance passes hit ships and modules. New ships and modules have been added over time so we have new tools to play with. Where they, with some guidance and explanations, "see the light" so to speak. I've been in help channels for years and while there sure are a whole bunch of folks who "just don't get it" or can't be bothered to get it there's also a large number of newbies who are willing to have their opinions and expectations challenged. EVE isn't for everyone nor should it try to cater to everyone, there's nothing wrong with not liking EVE but there is something fundamentally wrong with buying a niche product, then whine about how niche it is and demand to have it changed.Īlso OP's views are quite presumptuous, just because HE has trouble with there "being no content" (there is btw, lots of it and more than enough for newbies) doesn't mean ALL newbies share his view. If you don't like how there's just sand then you really have 2 choices: adapt or leave. Is that a problem? No not at all, JUST because something isn't main stream or similar to what most people know doesn't mean it's bad or should be changed. Some people like that, some people don't but most importantly most people aren't USED to it. OP is pretty much complaining about how a sandbox just has sand in it. I don't know why I didn't see that bit earlier, you just bombed your own thread, oxymoron. "Yet, there's no unbased critique in the OP." I will stand by my previous statement that the thread topic is an oxymoron.ĭo you actually have anything to say about the topic? It is very well conceivable for CCP to have a positive bias towards their product.Īnother point you seem to be missing, you are pointing out perceived faults of the game which by definition, makes your whole opinion biased. However, being biased or a critic goes both ways. From what I have just read, you seem to think for one to be biased or a critic, they need to have a negative opinion. If development criticizes their game, are they biased against it? That's an underwhelming standard for definition. It's simply saying that, even per CCP videos, motivation and expectations are key to improving retention and thus the overall experience. Yet, there's no unbased critique in the OP. I could pull the same dictionary and probably another definition that fits. An appeal to the dictionary is a logical fallacy, ya know.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |